Bigger breasts are not this easy

Today I stumbled across an incredible new technology which may just help you bridge the gap between your social life and the size of your boobs; the breast enlargement ringtone for your cellphone.

Dr Hideto Tomabechi is a Japanese cognitive scientist who has made it his mission to understand, among other things, how so called “functional” sounds can effect your neurochemistry and, indeed, even your physiology.

The basic premise behind Dr Tomabechi’s “rock melon” ringtone (no, I am not making this up) is that a woman’s breasts will enlarge if she is exposed to the sound of a crying baby repeatedly over a long period of time. Presumably making a ringtone which just sounds like an infant would be too darn simple, so the doctor decided to make that awful screeching noise instead.

Apart from the fact that Tomabechi went through a lot of effort for what he could have achieved in a few minutes with a microphone and an unhappy baby, the premise seems sound. However, there are a few questions which are not answered by Dr. Tomabechi or the producers of the Discovery Channel insert.

In an effort to understand the science behind the “rock melon” ringtone I tried to find any published research supporting the claims made by Dr Tomabechi. Unfortunately I was not able to find evidence of any trials of Dr Tomabechi’s ringtone. I could find nothing documenting a proposed mechanism for the ringtone’s effect, no information on methodology for testing the ringtone, no details about whether any women’s breasts were measured, nor how they were measured.

The only “evidence” we have for the effectiveness of “rock melon” is that which is presented by the Discovery channel, namely a young lady, called Ria, who measures her own chest circumference with a measuring tape. This is extremely weak evidence. Ria’s self measurement is open to too many unaccounted for variables. Firstly, Ria could have been been open to confirmation bias, she could have been wearing a more restrictive bra during the first measurement than the last, she may have taken a deeper breath for the last measurement. All of these confounding variables (and many more) are possibly producing a false positive result and because there is no research available, my concerns cannot be addressed.

The video clip makes brief mention of other evidence; correspondence from women around the world who wrote to Dr Tomabechi to affirm the effectiveness of the ringtone. Unfortunately this anecdotal evidence carries no weight in science and does not contribute to proving the efficacy of the ringtone.

In an effort to understand the possible effects of a babies cries on the size of a womans breasts I spoke at length with a professional midwife with extensive experience in the maternity wards of large hospitals in Durban and Johannesburg, Brenda O’Sullivan.

I carefully explained the details of Tomabechi’s ringtone and asked her opinion on whether or not prolonged exposure to the sound of a crying baby would  cause a womans breasts to grow.  Brenda’s answer was an unequivocal “NO”.

In her opinion there is no plausible mechanism by which the sound of a babies cries could cause the female’s breasts to grow. Whilst all mothers who have breastfed (myself included) can testify to the sensation of her milk “coming in” as her infant suckles at the breast, and sometimes even at the sound of his / her hungry cries, the very important difference is that these women are lactating already. Their bodies have gone through 40 long weeks of hormone induced changes to prepare them for this job.

Dr Tomabechi makes one further statement I would like to address, in the video he claims that their is a “muscular message” which tells the fat stored on your belly and on your butt to move towards your breasts. This claim is ludicrous. It is based on two flawed premises; firstly that fat stores in your body can move and secondly that messages to your muscles can cause this movement.

To address this ridiculous ambulatory fat idea I will turn to the Wikipedia entry on adipose tissue (human body fat);

In humans, adipose tissue is located beneath the skin (subcutaneous fat), around internal organs (visceral fat), and in the bone marrow (yellow bone marrow). Adipose tissue is found in specific locations which are referred to as ‘adipose depots.’ Adipose tissue contains several cell types, with the highest percentage of cells being adipocytes, which contain fat droplets. Other cell types include fibroblasts, macrophages and endothelial cells. Adipose tissue contains many small blood vessels. In the integumentary system, which includes the skin, it accumulates in the deepest level, the subcutaneous layer, providing insulation from heat and cold. Around organs, it provides protective padding.

Your body fat stays where it accumulates until you force your body to use it as fuel through vigorous physical activity. Listening to a strange noise is not going to instruct your muscles to move fat around in your body. Your muscles are not capable of doing this.

In closing, I would like to quote Michael Meadon’s thoughts on the topic of the breast enlarging ringtone;

Show me the evidence, Bitch!

I think that sums it up perfectly.

12 Responses to “Bigger breasts are not this easy”

  1. Dave Butterworth Says:

    anyway, I prefer small boobs!

  2. veronika Says:

    Did you really cite wikipedia?

  3. skepticdetective Says:

    yes, Wikipedia is a good source of information, and when you live out inn the sticks like I do, with NO access to a public or academic library, you just have to make the best of what you’ve got.
    If you would like to suggest better, free, online resources, I will be happy, HAPPY, to refer to them (provided they are trustworthy).

  4. wow Says:

    “and when you live out inn the sticks like I do, with NO access to a public or academic library, you just have to make the best of what you’ve got.”

    All your arguments just fell to nothing.

  5. wow Says:

    Really, thats how you do your researches?
    If its not on Wiki, its not real?

  6. skepticdetective Says:

    Wait a second, I did not say that if it’s not on Wiki it’s not real, furthermore how do my arguments become invalid simply because I use the internet as an information source?

    My ability to form a reasonable argument depends more on my ability to think rationally than it does on my local library.

  7. Michael Meadon Says:

    So… as an academic snob of note, and as someone who DOES have access to an academic library, I use and cite Wikipedia all the time. Heck, I even allow my students to cite it, so long as it’s a featured article.

    Wikipedia is an excellent source of information, and it’s pretty much as reliable as Britannica. Obviously, I don’t cite it in papers — but, then, serious folks very rarely cite encyclopedias of any sort in formal writing.

  8. Andreas Says:

    You allow your students to cite wiki, mate, my university would absolutely smash us for using wikipedia because when it comes down to it, it is not always a valid and non-biased source.
    Your citing of wikipedia is pretty low, I mean, pay for a subscription to a science data base.
    Tomabechi claims may be unfounded, and I have little doubt they have much power to them, but I mean in saying that, it is no different to the midwifes opinion either really.

  9. It’s my first birthday! « The Skeptic Detective Says:

    [...] Posts Seven Suspicious Water ClaimsBigger breasts are not this easyAnts in your brain?Vicks Vaporub on your feet?The Baby Carrot [...]

  10. jess Says:

    (wikipedia, some sites are fine, they are checked up on, you have to check the information on it. i.e if they have been read over, if someone flagged it, what their resources were etc. and when citing wiki- it is best to have another reference with it except when it is common knowledge)… 1st the discovery channel is putting utter crap up to fill up the gaps in air time BUT apart from how the fat part was worded in this video it could be plausible. And this man is not a biologist, but a cognitive psychologist. and under cognitive psychology this could be possible, but the brain can react differently in every person depending on the circumstances, their nature and their subconscious reaction- As the brain is linked to the body (mind over matter)… how would YOU get someones personal, new and not yet accredited research?… the woman in the video measuring herself was a way to show the ‘research’ on film. your nurse friend obviously would say no as she works with babies- how big are her breasts? and she strictly works with straight up biology. but this is the study of the mind. when someone is depressed do they get fat? sometimes yes, something in their surrounding affected them and it affected them personally -in that way because they are unique (for natural and nurture reasons) ((so not everyone will get depressed)) now this mood creates hormones in their brain that creates other ’symptoms’. like an increase in other hormones and a decrease in others- that have been said to stimulate fat. that persons biological make up will also be a factor, and not to mention depression causes self doubt so they would probably allow the weight gain to continue. . frequencies affect the brain full stop. like some music makes us happy- and the happy hormone creates immunity in our systems. there is no reason why frequencies could not create estrogen/ hormones that stimulate estrogen etc ; however odd it might sound. but whether this man is a fraud or not we have yet to see. and if his work is true, as it is cognitive and there ARE so many factors included with the brain and body, including will power- it will probably never be accredited.. but the fact that he said fat will move makes me doubtful. because if he is so intelligent to make such ringtones he should be learning everything there is to know about how they work or how they could work.


Leave a Reply